|
|
|
2001 Performance Measures
|
Environmental Services |
|
Solid Waste (Garbage) Management |
|
Solid Waste Management (Integrated System) |
$116.69 |
$ per household |
Explanation:
Average operating costs for solid waste management per
household.
Objective:
Efficient collection services. |
|
Waste Diversion |
21.12% |
% solid waste |
Explanation:
The percentage of residential waste diverted (based on
combined residential and ICI tonnage).
Objective:
Waste programs divert garbage from landfills and
incinerators. |
|
Wastewater (Sewage) Services |
|
Wastewater Collection, Treatment and Disposal (Integrated
System) |
$309.12 |
$ per megalitre |
Explanation:
The operating cost for collection, treatment and disposal of
wastewater per megalitre.
Objective:
Efficient wastewater collection, treatment and disposal
services. |
|
Wastewater Main Backups |
3.8462 |
# of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometres of
wastewater main. |
Explanation:
The number of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometers of
wastewater main in a year..
Objective:
To ensure Municipal sewage management practices prevent
environmental and human health hazards. |
|
Wastewater Bypasses Treatment |
0.00% |
% of wastewater |
Explanation: The percentage of wastewater
estimated to have bypassed treatment.
Objective: To ensure Municipal sewage
management practices prevent environmental and human health
hazards. |
|
Water Services |
|
Treatment & Distribution of Drinking Quality Water
(Integrated System) |
$383.05 |
$ per million litres |
Explanation:
The cost per million litres to treat and distribute drinking
water.
Objective:
Efficient municipal water treatment services. |
|
Water Main Breaks |
2.2727 |
# breaks per 100 km |
Explanation:
The number of breaks in water mains in a year that
required repair per 100 km of watermain.
Objective:
To minimize the loss of treated water. |
|
Boil Water Advisories |
0.00 |
# days |
Explanation:
The number of days when a boil water advisory, issued by the
medical officer of health, was in effect for part or all of
the municipal water supply.
Objective:
Water is safe and meets local needs. |
|
|
Transportation Services |
|
Road Services |
|
Winter Road Maintenance Costs |
$328.02 |
$/km |
Explanation:
The operating costs per lane kilometre associated with
winter road maintenance (e.g. snow plowing, salting,
sanding, snow removal).
Objective:
Efficient winter road maintenance services. |
|
Winter Event Responses |
93.62% |
% |
Explanation:
The percentage of winter road control activities (snow
plowing, road salting, etc.) in response to a weather
condition (snowfall, sleet, freezing rain, etc.) that met or
exceeded municipal road maintenance standards.
Objective:
To provide an appropriate winter storm event response to
ensure that any inconvenience and disruption in
transportation caused by the storm is minimized. |
|
Paved Roads |
$927.35 |
$ per paved land kilometre |
Explanation: The operating costs for paved
(hard top) roads per land kilometre.
Objective: Efficient road maintenance. |
|
Unpaved Roads |
$1057.74 |
$ per unpaved land kilometre |
Explanation: The operation costs for unpaved
(loose top) roads per land kilometre.
Objective: Efficient road maintenance. |
|
Adequacy of Roads |
71.14% |
% of lane kilometres tested were rated as good to very good. |
Explanation: Percentage of paved lane
kilometres rated as good to very good.
Objective: To provide a paved road system that
has a pavement condition that meets municipal objectives. |
|
Protection Services |
|
Fire Services |
|
Fire Protection Costs |
$0.37 |
$ per $1,000 of assessment |
Explanation:
The operating costs per thousand dollars of assessment for
fire services which includes firefighters, fire prevention,
emergency responses, equipment and administration.
Objective:
Efficient municipal fire services. |
|
Police Services (Crime Rate) |
|
Violent Crime |
10.44 |
# of violent crimes per 1,000 people |
Explanation: Total number of actual incidents
of violent crime, including youths.
Objective: Safe communities. |
|
Property Crime |
24.42 |
# of property crimes per 1,000 people |
Explanation: Total number of actual incidents
of property crime, including youths.
Objective: Safe communities. |
|
Youth Crime |
2.45 |
# of youth crimes per 1,000 people |
Explanation: Total number of actual incidents
of youth crime.
Objective: Safe communities. |
|
Total Crimes |
43.85 |
# of crimes per 1,000 people |
Explanation: Total number of Crimes per 1,000
people.
Objective: Safe communities. |
|
General Government |
|
Municipal Administration |
|
Operating Costs |
3.02% |
% of total municipal operating costs |
Explanation:
The cost for general government as a percentage of total
municipal operating costs (based on general government
support).
Objective:
Efficient general government support of local services. |
|
Planning and Development |
|
Land Use Planning |
|
Location of New Development |
80.36% |
% of new lots, blocks and/or units |
Explanation: The percentage of new lots, blocks and/or
units with final approval that are located within settlement
areas.
Objective: To ensure new lot creation is occurring in
settlement areas. |
|
New development with final approval which is located within
settlement area |
|
New Lots |
43 |
# of Lots |
Explanation:
Number of new lots within settlement areas
Objective:
New lot creation is occurring in settlement
areas.
|
|
New Blocks |
2 |
# of Blocks |
Explanation:
Number of new blocks within settlement areas
Objective:
New block creation is
occurring in settlement areas. |
|
New development with final approval within entire
municipality |
|
New Lots |
54 |
# of Lots |
Explanation: Number of new
lots within settlement areas
Objective: New lot creation is occurring in settlement
areas. |
|
New Blocks |
2 |
# of Blocks |
Explanation: Number of new
block within settlement areas
Objective: New block creation is occurring in settlement
areas. |
|
Preservation of Agricultural
Land in Reporting Year |
100% |
% of Land |
Explanation: Percentage of
Land Designated for agricultural purposes, which was
preserved during the reporting year.
Objective: Preservation of agricultural land. |
|
Preservation of Agricultural Land Relative to Base Year |
99.99% |
% of Land |
Explanation: Percentage of
land designated for agricultural purposes in the Official
Plan was preserved relative to the base year of 2000.
Objective: Preservation of agricultural land in
reporting year. |
|
Change in
number of designated hectares since January 1, 2000 |
1 |
# of
Hectares |
Explanation: Number of
hectares that were redesignated from agricultural purposes
to other uses since January 1, 2000.
Objective: Preservation of agricultural land. |
Note 1:
There is no weigh scale at the landfill site, tonnage is
estimated.
|
|
